CNN
—
The prime ministers of two small island nations that face ongoing impacts from rising sea ranges will seem at authorized hearings at a global court docket in Hamburg, Germany, on Monday, and search an advisory opinion on the obligations of nations to fight local weather change.
Prime Ministers Kausea Natano of Tuvalu and Gaston Browne of Antigua and Barbuda will give proof on the Worldwide Tribunal for the Legislation of the Sea, which is able to take into account whether or not carbon emissions absorbed by the ocean ought to be thought-about marine air pollution, and what obligations nations have to guard the marine atmosphere.
The tribunal will challenge an advisory opinion, which isn’t legally binding, however presents an authoritative assertion on authorized issues that might information nations as they craft local weather safety legislation.
The prime ministers, representing the Fee of Small Island States on Local weather Change and Worldwide Legislation (COSIS), will argue that nations have an obligation to guard the marine atmosphere underneath the UN conference on the Legislation of the Sea, together with from greenhouse fuel emissions.
“We come right here searching for pressing assist, within the sturdy perception that worldwide legislation is an important mechanism for correcting the manifest injustice that our persons are struggling on account of local weather change,” mentioned Tuvalu’s Natano.
Extreme carbon air pollution leads to injury to the oceans, together with coral bleaching and acidification.
Low-lying island states like Tuvalu and Vanuatu are additionally susceptible to turning into submerged by water by the tip of the century resulting from slow-onset local weather impacts.
Small island nations have additionally sought authorized readability on nations’ local weather obligations in different courts. Vanuatu led a marketing campaign to ask the Worldwide Courtroom of Justice (ICJ) to challenge an advisory opinion on nations’ obligations to handle local weather change.
The UN Common Meeting in March voted to refer the case to the ICJ, which is able to challenge an opinion in 2024.