LHC declares Ravi Riverfort City Growth Undertaking unlawful


Lahore Excessive Court docket constructing. Photograph: Geo.television/ file
  • LHC directs Ravi City Growth Authority to return cash acquired from govt in two months.
  • Declares Part four of RUDA (modification) Ordinance 2021 unconstitutional.
  • Remarks land for RRUDP was acquired by means of violation of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

LAHORE: The Lahore Excessive Court docket on Tuesday declared the Ravi Riverfort City Growth Undertaking (RRUDP) unlawful whereas asserting a verdict on the petitions towards the venture.

The petitions, filed by advocates Sheraz Zaka, Ahmad Rafay Alam and others on behalf of the farmers, challenged the mode and method of the land acquisition proceedings undertaken by the Ravi City Growth Authority (RUDA) for RRUDP.

The courtroom additionally declared Part four of the Ravi City Growth Authority (modification) Ordinance 2021 illegal and unconstitutional.

The talked about part is contradictory to Article 144 of the Structure of Pakistan, it mentioned.

“Agricultural land will be acquired solely when there’s a correct authorized framework for it however the land for RRUDP was acquired by means of a violation of Land Acquisition Act, 1894,” the courtroom remarked.

“Lahore and Sheikhupura didn’t abide by the legislation within the land acquisition,” the courtroom mentioned.

The LHC mentioned, whereas asserting the decision, that since RRUDP’s grasp plan is the essential doc, all of the schemes needs to be below the masterplan as per the legislation.

“Therefore, any scheme labored upon with out [being included in] the grasp plan is unlawful,” the courtroom mentioned.

Giving the commentary that RUDA’s modification ordinance has didn’t fulfil the constitutional necessities, the courtroom directed the Authority to return the cash it had acquired from the federal government inside two months.

The case

The petitioners had questioned the legality of forceful acquisitions of land for business functions below the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, whereas a few of them questioned the legality of the Surroundings Affect Evaluation of the venture ready by an unregistered marketing consultant.

The petitioners’ counsels objected that if the venture was bereft of environmental affect evaluation, how might or not it’s presumed of public function. They argued that the venture would deprive the farmers of their valuable land and such deprivation was an infringement of basic rights.

On this, the LHC had stayed the the method of land acquisition for the venture for not assembly the authorized necessities and environmental legal guidelines over the petitions.

Nevertheless, the federal government of Punjab was of the view that since Ravi City Authority (modification) Ordinance 2021 was handed to cowl authorized infirmities, the keep orders granted by the courtroom and the petitions towards the venture stood infructuous.

supply hyperlink

supply hyperlink